Cookie policy

By pursuing your navigation on our website, you allow us to place cookies on your device. These cookies are set in order to secure your browsing, improve your user experience and enable us to compile statistics. For further information, please report to our cookie policy and our data protection notice.

  • Strictly necessary cookies (mandatory)
  • Analytics cookies
Article (150/252)
Triparty collateral management opens new horizons
Triparty collateral management opens new horizons

Triparty collateral management opens new horizons


Today, financial institutions are rethinking their practices of collateral management and breaking the existing silos. They are seeking more sophisticated collateral solutions in order to use a wide range of securities to back their trades and mobilise their assets when and where they are needed.

Triparty collateral management

Increasingly, market participants are turning to the triparty model. Acting as a neutral party, the triparty agent manages the collateralisation of exposures resulting from trading activities between two counterparties. How can a service, designed historically for interdealer transactions, be leveraged to fully meet any collateral management requirements? What are the conditions necessary for an efficient triparty collateral management?

Let’s have a look at three different collateral requirements: variation margin on uncleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives, initial margin on non-cleared OTC and securities financing transactions.

Using equities as collateral

The main characteristic of bilateral management on uncleared OTC derivatives is the almost exclusive use of cash and government bonds. There is an inherent risk in using equities as collateral due to the frequency of corporate actions. When these occur, there may be a tax risk when failing to detect such an event or substitute on time.

Therefore some asset managers have had to change their investment profile to hold cash or bonds. This may have an impact on their returns, especially for UCITS funds which cannot "transform” their equities because of regulatory guidelines

The triparty model is perfectly suited to manage equities as collateral. However, this solution is viable for the buy-side only if various criteria are met:

  • Both buy-side and sell-side participants adapt their OTC derivatives processes to create a new operational path for triparty collateral management
  • The triparty agent complies with the asset segregation rules[1] applicable to certain institutional investors. These are not entirely uniform  - some local rules must be considered[2]
  • Triparty management must be directly "connected" to the client's main account to avoid constantly having to manage collateral inventory realignments

BNP Paribas Securities Services is the only global custodian with a triparty service directly funded by the customer's current account. Too often, the customer has to manage an additional account (called a "longbox"), which reduces the benefits of the triparty model. In a "longbox" configuration, the customer must pre-select the securities to be transferred to the "longbox", recall the surplus securities to the main account, reconcile their positions over several accounts, etc.

Initial margin for non-cleared OTC derivatives

After the first three waves of September 2016, 2017 and 2018, initial margin requirements for non-cleared derivatives will start to impact a larger number of non-cleared swaps counterparties from September 2019 and 2020 [3] . On one hand, market participants will have to pledge a significant amount of collateral. On the other, they will have to implement a specific framework to comply with the new regulatory requirements.

In addition to the calculation and portfolio matching, OTC derivatives participants have to set up a specific process for initial margin:

  • Initial margin comes in addition to the current variation margin flow (used to cover the OTC derivatives mark-to-market), with a different set-up
  • Initial margin is a two-way gross margining process. Each party needs to transfer collateral, from both the pledgor and pledgee’ perspective.
  • Parties have to determine, with each of their counterparties, the minimum transfer amounts (MTAs), the initial thresholds, the eligible collateral and haircuts
  • Collateral cannot be re-used or re-hypothecated, and it has to comply with stringent concentration and wrong way risk limitations
  • Initial margin needs to be pledged in favor of the counterparty, on a segregated custody account, with a specific legal framework (dedicated “Account Control Agreement”)

In Europe, tri-party collateral agents have strongly supported their clients during the first waves. They offer a fully automated solution for the matching and allocation of initial margin across counterparties, as well as the appropriate pledge mechanisms and default management process. Given the approaching deadlines and expected workload, firms must now quickly finalise their definition of a target framework, looking at the best combination between calculations, collateral management and custody services.

What about triparty securities financing?

Today, the hundreds of billions of collateral linked to securities financing transactions mainly come from inter-dealer transactions with few buy-side participants. With quantitative easing, low interest rates, and the requirements of Basel III, banking counterparties are seeking high quality liquid assets over the long term. As a result, institutional investors[4] are eyeing new opportunities for securities lending or repo transactions, in order to generate additional income, which is particularly welcomed in the current environment.

For post-trade, it is essential to optimise the full operations chain: confirmation with the counterparty, fees calculation, portfolio accounting, monitoring funds’ ratios and collateral management, etc.

As with OTC derivatives, triparty platforms are well positioned:

  • Basket repos can be easily managed as the cash leg settlement is synchronised with several lines of securities defined by an eligibility matrix (also known as the “basket”)
  • They provide more velocity to the collateral giver, notably when refinancing small lines of securities
  • The type of collateral can be broader - equities or corporate bonds - enabling the buy-side to obtain more attractive execution spreads

At the turning point

Financial institutions are rethinking their collateral management practices and breaking down existing silos. Although the concept of a triparty service was initially created for the interdealer business, it will be used more widely across financial institutions’ derivatives activities. To make it a success, market players should have a comprehensive approach that involves multiple teams. They need to ensure that processes along the value chain, from front-office and middle- and back-office, are fully adapted to a triparty service.

Click below to learn about our triparty collateral service:


Triparty collateral management services in a nutshell

The role of a triparty collateral agent encompasses:

  • Recording of any collateral agreements, including global master repurchase agreement (GMRA), global master securities lending agreement GMSLA or credit support annex (CSA)
  • Receiving and matching client instructions across various types of transaction (repo, securities lending, OTC derivatives, financing, etc.)
  • Valuation of collateral assets and calculation of net exposure, for various types of collateral assets (equities, fixed income, ETFs, cash)
  • Real-time selection and allocation of collateral allocation from the available collateral inventory
  • Event and substitution management (corporate actions, sell of collateral holdings)


Read more

Time for ETFs to play a more active role in securities lending and collateral optimisation

[1] Such as UCITS and AIFMD
[2] For example same segregation rules apply to Italian pension funds
[3] Smaller buy-side participants will not be impacted
[4] Excluding UCITS funds that cannot participate in term securities financing transactions due to regulatory restrictions

Follow us